A People’s History of Money

Money has taken many forms. Shells, salt, gold, whiskey, paper, and now code. At its core, it is a medium of exchange. But it is also something deeper. It is a story people agree to believe. A shared trust that makes trade possible.

Throughout history, people have placed that trust in different things. Sometimes it was something physical with inherent value. Something they could hold, trade, or drink. Sometimes it was institutional, placed in banks, governments, or paper promises. And when that trust no longer made sense, people looked elsewhere. They created new ways to trade, store value, and make sure that their hard-earned wealth wasn’t squandered.

This is a people’s history of money. It follows the rebels and builders who shaped value outside the usual systems. Not through policy. Through grit. Through trade.

Disclosure: Some links in this post are affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra charge to you. It helps keep the lights on. Thanks for being a part of the Parlor.

Barter and the Beginnings of Exchange

Before coins, contracts, or credit, there was barter. All we had was our goods and our skills. One person had what another needed. They traded. Maybe it was a sack of grain for a piece of cloth. Maybe it was labor for livestock. It worked because it had to. But it was never perfect.

Barter depended on timing. It required what economists call a “double coincidence of wants.” Both parties had to want what the other had, at the same time, in the right amount. That made trade slow. And fragile.

It also lacked flexibility. Corn spoiled. Tools wore out. A bushel of apples was hard to split three ways or carry across town. People needed something easier to store and measure. Something durable. Something trusted.

Still, barter wasn’t a failure. We still do it to some extent. Every time you help a friend move for a pizza and a beer is a barter. Bartering was the first experiment in value exchange. It proved that people would always find ways to trade. Even without systems. Even without money. The seeds of modern markets were planted in those early, hand-to-hand deals.

On the American frontier, barter stayed alive far longer than most people realize. Settlers traded bullets, animal pelts, whiskey, and tools. All that mattered was whether someone else saw value in what you were trading and how much they valued it.

Gold and Trust in Metal

As societies grew, the shortcomings of the barter system became more obvious. Populations grew and trade expanded beyond local villages. The double coincidence of wants became a bigger roadblock. People needed something with universal value. Something they could carry, measure, and trust.

Metals met that criteria. Primarily gold and silver. These metals were rare, durable, and easy to measure and divide by weight. Metals had another benefit that made their value more universal. They had utility. People used them to make tools, jewelry, and ornamentation long before they became currency. Their beauty and utility gave them intrinsic value. That made them ideal for trade.

When early societies began stamping coins, it solved another problem. Stamped coins made transactions faster and more secure. Their size and markings showed where they came from and how much they were worth. A quick weight check with a scale was all you needed.

Fraud, Deceit, and Loss of Trust

Precious metals still have intrinsic value but nothing is without downsides. Even metals can be manipulated. Dishonest people began trimming the edges of coins and keeping the shavings. This was one of the earliest known forms of currency counterfeiting. Governments took this fraud even further. The Roman Empire, for example, began debasing its coins by mixing in cheaper metals. What looked like silver or gold wasn’t pure. The weight dropped. The value dropped. The people paid the price.

Trust was undermined. Every transaction needed to be verified. Even if you trusted your trade partner, they might have coins that the government debased.

Quiet Rebellion and Practical Resistance

People didn’t storm buildings or start riots over this. But they resisted in smart ways. They hoarded the good coins. They melted down pure silver and hid it away. They weighed every piece before accepting it. Trust shifted back from the government’s stamp to the metal itself.

In some places, communities returned to barter or bullion. They traded goods directly or dealt only in raw silver by weight. In England, businesses and individuals minted their own copper tokens when official coins lost credibility. These private currencies circulated for decades, trusted more than what came from the crown.

It was rebellion with disciplined and principled action. People simply chose value over orders. And that quiet refusal paved the way for what came next.

The Ease of Paper Money

Metal coins present another problem. They’re heavy. Lugging around sacks of silver or gold wasn’t ideal for long-distance trade, growing markets, or day-to-day purchases. People needed something lighter. Something easier to move and manage. Paper fits the bill.

Paper currency started as a kind of receipt. Merchants or depositors would leave their coins or bullion with a trusted party, often a goldsmith or bank, and receive a written note in return. That note could be exchanged later for the metal it represented. It was more convenient, less risky, and easier to carry. In time, those notes became tradable on their own because people trusted they could be redeemed. They represented ownership like a deed to land.

Governments and banks soon formalized the system. They printed paper notes backed by reserves of gold or silver. This made paper money official policy and the primary means of exchange. Coins still circulated, but paper took the lead in daily life. You only needed silver coins for smaller purchases.

Paper money made trade faster, safer, and more flexible. Merchants didn’t need to weigh every coin or inspect every edge. A trusted note could change hands quickly and keep business moving. Long-distance trade grew. Markets expanded. And everyday people could carry wealth without hauling metal.

Whiskey, Rebellion, and the Currency of the Frontier

In the rural backcountry of early America, paper money didn’t always make it to the people. Official coinage was scarce. Banking was limited. And many small farmers lived far from the reach of the nation’s early financial systems. But they had something else: grain, water, fire, and skill. They had whiskey.

Whiskey wasn’t just drink. It was value, stored and distilled. It didn’t spoil, it could be traded in small amounts, and everyone knew what it was worth. A jug of whiskey might buy meat, tools, or even settle a debt. In the absence of reliable government currency, whiskey filled the gap.

It was especially popular in western Pennsylvania, where corn or rye could be turned into liquid currency. Farmers transported it more easily than raw grain, and it brought a better price. But when the federal government imposed a tax on whiskey in 1791 at the recommendation of Alexander Hamilton, resistance followed.

To frontier families, whiskey was their means of financial survival. Many of these men were veterans of the Revolutionary War, which they had just fought less than two decades earlier over taxes imposed by the British government. “No taxation without representation” was the rallying cry for the war. This new tax was no different. To these farmers in the remote rural areas of the country, this was a betrayal.

The farmers refused to pay and even took up arms the same way the colonists did against the British in the time leading up to the Revolutionary War. After an unsuccessful proclamation to get them to comply, President Washington sent nearly 13,000 militiamen to prove his point. The show of force worked. The uprising dissolved under pressure.

Fiat Currency and the Power to Print

The next major shift in the story of money wasn’t about changing materials. It was a return to an old tactic. Removing the value that gold brought to currency and replacing it with the power to manipulate.

For centuries, coins had real value because they were made of precious metals. Even paper money, at first, was just a stand-in for gold or silver stored somewhere else. You could walk into a bank and exchange your bills for metal. That link kept governments in check. They couldn’t print more paper than they had gold to cover. At least, not without risking a run on their reserves.

But over time, that restraint faded.

World governments gradually reduced the amount of silver in coins during the 20th century, then removed it almost entirely. In 1933, President Roosevelt banned most private gold ownership, cutting off the ability to exchange dollars for gold. In 1971, the last remaining tie was severed when President Nixon took the U.S. off the gold standard completely. From that point forward, dollars were backed by nothing but “full faith and credit” in the United States government.

This is fiat money: currency declared legal tender by a government, without intrinsic value and without a peg to anything scarce. It can be created at will. And it often is. When you need money, you just print more.

Without sound money, without anything real behind the paper, inflation has chipped away at savings. Purchasing power has declined. And trust now depends on policy, perception, and politics. The ability to print money became a tool of power. One that can fund wars, fuel bubbles, or bail out the failures of the elite. All while eroding the value of the paychecks and savings of everyday people.

The Digital Rebellion

History repeats a pattern. When people lose trust in money, they find new ways to take back control.

Hoarding gold and remelting silver was one answer. Whiskey was another. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, after bailouts, inflation, and eroding trust in centralized banks, Bitcoin emerged. Not as a currency of the state, but as a challenge to it. A peer-to-peer system backed not by gold or government decree, but by math, transparency, and consensus.

There’s no central bank. No printer. No single point of failure. Only a network of independent nodes enforcing a fixed supply: 21 million coins. Bitcoin is digital, but its principles are old: scarcity, self-custody, independence. It echoes the same frontier logic that once turned whiskey into tradable value.

Other digital currencies have followed, each with its own rules and risks. Many are volatile or experimental. Some are centralized in ways that undermine the point. But others share a core principle with Bitcoin: keeping control in the hands of the users, not the institutions.

Unlike gold, Bitcoin isn’t physical. It isn’t even sound money in the traditional sense. There’s no anchor to any real-world useful commodity. But it is hard money: fixed, transparent, and resistant to manipulation. And it’s infinitely divisible, making it usable for everything from micro-payments to large-scale transfers.

It’s not perfect. But it’s not dishonest. And for many, that’s enough to call it freedom.

The Next Wave of Manipulation

Like clockwork, the plans to manipulate the new money are underway with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

CBDCs aren’t like Bitcoin. They aren’t decentralized, scarce, or permissionless. They’re state-issued, centrally managed, and programmable. Every transaction can be tracked. Every coin can be coded with conditions. Expiration dates, spending limits, or blocklists for certain goods or people. These aren’t science fiction. They’re features being openly discussed.

They’ll likely offer the same efficiency, lower transaction costs, and instant settlement as other digital currencies. But underneath, they’re the digital descendant of fiat. Another evolution of currency with no anchor and total trust in the issuer. Only now, the control is tighter, the surveillance easier, and the potential for abuse far greater.

For those who value freedom and self-determination, this new chapter only strengthens the need to explore alternatives. As history shows, whenever money shifts toward centralized control, people find new ways to claim their financial independence.

The Value Worth Defending

From whiskey to gold to Bitcoin, money tells a story of trust, of rebellion, of people taking back control when systems fail.

Every form of currency is a reflection of what we value and how we fight to protect it. It’s never just about wealth. It’s about independence. Resilience. Ingenuity.

So the question isn’t just what money is. It’s what kind of value you want to build and HODL.

Because money isn’t just a medium; it’s a decision. A reflection of what we value most when trust is thin.
(Explore how value and decision-making work in our deeper dive on praxeology.)

Dig into the story, subscribe for the next one, and check out the shop if you’re feeling curious.

Hard Money, Hard Gear